[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 1, Issue 1 (Islamic Human Rights Journal 2024) ::
IHRJ 2024, 1(1): 1-29 Back to browse issues page
Assessing the Feasibility of Intercultural Dialogue on Human Rights and Shari‘a Based on the Theoretical Framework of Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na‘im: A Critical Reflection in the Horizon of Islamic Human Rights Philosophy
Mohammad Ghsem Tangestani *1 , Mahdi Moradi Berelian2
1- Associate Professor, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.
Abstract:   (159 Views)
This article adopts a philosophical and critical approach to examine Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na'im's theoretical framework concerning the relationship between Shari'a, the state, and human rights, while opening up new horizons for intercultural dialogue from the perspective of Islamic human rights philosophy. Emphasizing the institutional separation of religion and the state and a historical-interpretive reconstruction of Shari'a, An-Na'im argues that the realization of human rights in Muslim societies requires a fluid, voluntary, and non-coercive interpretation of religion rooted in civic engagement. Within this framework, Shari'a is not regarded as a fixed or absolute text, but rather as a dynamic space for ijtihad that is both open to transformation and dialogue with contemporary global norms. Through a critical analysis of An-Na'im's hermeneutic foundations and practical philosophy, this article shows that despite his attempt to reconcile religious commitment with the requirements of human rights, his model encounters significant tensions—most notably, the paradox between structural secularism and the civic presence of Islamic values in the public sphere. Furthermore, the feasibility of intercultural dialogue within this framework necessitates a rethinking of three core domains: the language of dialogue, the boundaries of jurisprudential transformation, and the localized interpretation of human rights. In conclusion, the article assesses both the potential and limitations of An-Na'im’s paradigm in light of the philosophical foundations of Islamic human rights discourse.
Keywords: Shari‘a, Human Rights, Secular State, Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na‘im, Intercultural Dialogue, Philosophy of Law, Hermeneutic Critique, Islamic Human Rights
Full-Text [PDF 888 kb]   (28 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2024/11/17 | Accepted: 2025/01/20 | Published: 2025/03/5
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tangestani M G, Moradi Berelian M. Assessing the Feasibility of Intercultural Dialogue on Human Rights and Shari‘a Based on the Theoretical Framework of Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na‘im: A Critical Reflection in the Horizon of Islamic Human Rights Philosophy. IHRJ 2024; 1 (1) :1-29
URL: http://islamichumanrights.ir/article-1-51-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 1, Issue 1 (Islamic Human Rights Journal 2024) Back to browse issues page
مجله حقوق بشر اسلامی Islamic Human Rights Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4718